Go to life page for the full table
- 1 Why: Introduction
- 2 What is flove
- 3 How flove is made
- 3.1 Ontology: Layers
- 3.2 Constants, dyads and triads
- 3.3 Deontology: Floves into layers
- 3.4 Rank axioms
- 3.5 Automating definitions: Flove language
- 3.6 Flove metrics
- 3.7 See also
Whatever keyword we use in our life serve us for expressing something we see. Any keyword is identified by its semantics: The meaning of any keyword is in its relation with the nearer related or more antagonist keywords to the keyword we use.
Words tend to have stablished meanings by regular social use, and local culture peculiarities make their contributions (sometimes differientating meanings) to the meaning of keywords too. Having said this, we:
- Look for tidying a view of the whole, along with the view of the meaning of each keyword. Despite local cultural peculiarities interpreting differences in meanings, we can aim to express a view of the whole very much able to be universally consensual.
- We can and have to be able to express such everything and-or parts of it with (simultaneous) lists of 2 and 3 elements only.
- All the keywords relations are entangled. There is a traceable way from any concept to any other. Concepts are just a more observable way to see how everything is interconnected. Describing relations between concepts in a deeper way helps us for understanding the process by how anything happens, and we understanding not only for the sake of observing, but by for the sake of interacting it further, so we-this project should help in modelling practices for achieving naturally wished objectives of increasing loveliness in any part of life, and for knowing how to go from any part to any other.
See an extended why this project is needed
What is flove
Floves are keywords framed within a full life view default. This default view serves as a base for a future interactive and more crowdsourced life viewer application where to see your own view and get hints about it by contrasting it to the default view.
The flove keywords serve as representatives for interactive models (flove.org subdomains, entangled applications launcher) aimed to promote loveliness in each of the layers of life, as reducted here (while they still being flexible and expansible).
How flove is made
See below step-by-step how this default life view with the floves in it is done:
We tend to call the whole as the universe. But this universe we say to represent the whole is composed by two elements:
- Unobservable universe
- Observable universe
For a better understanding of the difference we can better name that these 2 primary elements as:
- Universe (Unobservable universe)
- Nature (Observable universe)
So by referring to whatever we (can) observe, i.e. Nature, we have to take into mind that such Nature is more accurately speaking:
- Nature (+Universe)
Or, in synonim words, everything (the whole) is basically composed of:
- Nature we see (+ Universe we don't see)
Constants, dyads and triads
With Universe and Nature we have a primary dyad and universal nature and-or natural universe as the primary dual constant. But this primary dyad has in it a third component: the observer. So this primarity (nature and universe) besides necesarily having to be a dyad (and not only an absolute -unique- concept or keyword), are (necessarily have to be) also a triad:
So now, once again, for raising a higher consensus view at this primarity, we do two aesthetical tweaks: We will rename observer into biology for by the way, phrasing these three with the better sounding -al suffix for them:
Once having achieved this, we can extend them into some minimal layers:
Deontology: Floves into layers
All layers have a descriptive aesthetic that we can complement with a more prescriptive aesthetic. Flove is how we call this prescriptions for the descriptions, or in more simple words: Flove are the lovely expressions (or actions) of any layer, i.e:
- Universal --> Flow
- Natural --> Real
- Biological --> Agency
Let's try-test how consensual this sounds: Everything is...
The biological agency of the natural reality in the universal flow...
If this sounds consensual to you, and to everyone you can imagine of, we are threading fine...
Let's now create one lovely expression for each layer:
We can also polarize the flove lovely expressions adding far lovely expressions:
Extending the dual triads with moralities: Bright and Shade
To every Layer we have added a Flove keyword to it. We have selected to add an keyword guided by Aesthetic & Moral principles we want to promote. The moral aesthethics of adding Floves into Layers has been: Complementarity (not antagonist). This is fine, but not fine enough because by integrating antagonisms we will better understand closely this whole we want to express. So to the Layers and Floves we have defined, let's add two additional triads with antagonist moral aesthetics to each, for helping us understanding closely each of the expression and the whole process:
Brigth: Source --> Evolve --> Express
Shade: Lack --> Twist --> Excesss
Where each, i.e. Source, is one pole that has its antagonist pole, i.e. Lack: The more Source the less Lack
Life full set
The following table is a fully triadic life set:
Higher or lower ranked (f)loves (flows) are (always) vibrating more or less intensevely but equivalently in the (limited) layers of life through a certain simultaneous evolvable processing of bright and shade.
Bright vibrates more flove if less sibling shade and more upper floves vibrate along
We have vibrating manias based in our gender, personal history, cultural and social influences and more specially based in present shade we view not being redeemed in our local and global environtment
Science is (still, only) (descriptive) code that easily vibrates truth. But science will never view-know-code it all and missed or remaining truths will rely on faith. So science is useful for extending (making more lovely) the (normal universal, natural, human) experiencing of faith, the highest experienceable free will, within a deterministic framework (needed for the stability of the whole).
Flove forms bright sources in its lower layer
The more bright source as higher flove has been
Otherwise, actual twisted shade will go to lack instead of going to excess and far lovely. This would make lower flows flowing shader because of this upper shade vibration, and will cause an acceleration for the expression of equivalent brightness starting to be felt in such shadier body, which if refused will come to be expressed through other related or far bodies to the shady ones.
See more: process phrases
"Life is an offensive, directed against the repetitious of the Universe" -- A. Whitehead
Ranks are expressed by comparing the position of concepts within the whole view: upper, broader and-or most wanted or brighter are ways to identify ranking. Ranks do exist to our natural reason since i.e. we are more afraid of death than of worry, we are more likely to like to be more often happy than being sad the majority of our time. So ranks are basically finally expressing how much bright should deserve each vibration in life compared to another.
But despite its rank and this following affirmation that will posible be very polemic to our reasoning: every vibration is relative to the rest of others, so ranks are perceptions and not strict hierarchies i.e. death is not universally worse than worry, being sad is not less important than being happy, etc.. . Nevertheless, and as said above, ranks do help us understand the and what matters most than other matters in our life.
See more: ranks phrases
Automating definitions: Flove language
Being strict doing lists only with pairs and triads help us for doing analogies. I.e. the gender analogy help us having interpretations with specific cross-perspectives within the global view.
1st child is vibrated equal by genders
2nd child is a more femaled vibration
3rd child is a more maled vibration
I.e. You can refer to any dyad or triad that you know more, and use it as an analogy default for trying to understand other pairs you don't get that much, for testing its rigour or compare them to other lists of 3 you know (i.e. tesling, etc)
All this structural effort helps anyone being able to meassure the more or less flove that could be in any life event, i.e.
Metrics on shortalks
This table rates some people's short talks expressing flove in life with their own words.
This table rates te flove vibrating of some philosopers from the past
Go to the life page
Go to flove.org