Home

From Wowwiki
Revision as of 20:46, 7 January 2019 by Coco (talk | contribs) (Why: Introduction)
Jump to: navigation, search

This wowwiki is a documentation space for the flove.org project.


Go to life page for the full table


Why: Introduction

By we not being able to get to know all nor most of all is the more basic mechanism that allow us to experience the life we live in. The enigma is fuelling us, but has a toll to assume within it: An existential void to be permanetly fulfilled is the evolutive challenge that we have to be permanently dealing with. By developing this project i am hoping to help everyone in reaching a comfortable stand in his-her positioning within the necessary shades of life, which i previously warn you: paradoxically, the-your shades will increase at the same time as i will be feeding your consciousness with the light brought to you by my advanced art in the ordering of words i offer you. And don't be afriad of me, nor be afraid of getting more consciouss about what life is. This life mechanism works perfectly like that, it has been always like this: the more you get to know, the more your unknowns will increase.

Words are just a more evolved type of matter that we call symbols. Symbolism do help us humans in reflecting our experience in this world, this way we fill part of the existential void we are in. Symbols do serve us as anchors in our navigation in this ocean of shade. Pictures do have in a way more symbolism than words and need less consensual effort, but words get to reach in some other way further accuracy in their expressed symbolism but in the other hand, they need more consensual effort. We humans have evolved language and a side product that we call civilized society because of this, to have stronger looking like anchors for our ship, but we should also note than in the way of increassing accuracy in the symbolism through wording language, we have also lost an important part of the focus in previous symbolism experiencing that other beings are still experiencing probably more than us. We do also sitll experience the power of such wordless symbolism through the so called art, dreams or imagination.. but this piece of work i introduce you is mainly about the symbolic accuracy side we evolve with words, and its further evolution called language. This project initially and finally proposes mechanisms to get closer to the more ambitious posible project for our reasoning, that i call & slogan as Flove: the language of love. By developing it, we will notice further that in fact, there is not rivalry between language and art. In fact we will realize the opposite: that a better expressing of linguistic symbolism is what better fosters the capacity for symbolic art.

Whatever word we use in our life serve us for expressing-recognizing something we feel-see. The meaning of any word is in its relation with the nearer related or more antagonist words to the word we use (semantics). Words tend to have their meanings stablished by regular use. We start liking to stablish the meaning of a word in a personal sphere, then such meaning is approved by the one hearing to us, then its consensus around it scales, the meaning gets universalized through a social norm.

The meaning of the word gets accepted by a small or larger communitty, up to being added into the so called dictionaries. Law, in this sense, is the equivalent prescriptive companion for the descriptive dictionary. So we are not only about to develop a descriptive language of love, we will use it for the specifying of the so-called prescriptive natural law.

Anyone is free to create, mean and modify words and meanings. A particular word can mean a lot to a couple who remember how much in love they were when they both used that invented word. But this couple will find difficult others around them accepting to use that new word or meaning. Same happens with local cultures giving specific meanings to words that mean a different thing to the majority of other cultures. But despite this open culture in the meaningfulness, there are words which their meanings are high and quite stable for most cultures. This reductive trend tells-hints us about how all the complex things tend to get also simplified. There is a dynamic finiteness of structures and we can also see how the fine tuning is still active and evolves. Having said all this, we-this project:

  1. Look for tidying a view of the whole, along with the view of the meaning of each of the most meaningful keywords. Despite local cultural peculiarities interpreting differences in meanings, we aim to express a view of the whole able to be very much social-universally consensual.
  2. We can and have to be able to express such everything and-or parts of it from and with (simultaneous) lists of 2 and 3 elements only.
  3. All the keywords and their relations are entangled. There is a traceable way from any concept to any other that we aim to reveal. Concepts are one form of evolved matter, so they are a more observable way to see how everything is interconnected. Describing relations between concepts in a deeper way helps us for understanding the process by how anything happens. We are looking for a better understanding not only for the sake of contemplative observation, we want to understand what we observe for the sake of interacting it further-deeper, so we-this project should help in modelling practices for achieving naturally wished objectives of increasing loveliness in any part of life, and for knowing how to go from any part to any other, whatever the shade (lack of love) there could be in it.
See an extended why this project is needed

What is flove

Floves are keywords framed within a full life view default. This default view serves as a base for a future interactive and more crowdsourced life viewer application where to see your own view and get hints about it by contrasting it to the default view.

The flove keywords serve as representatives for interactive models (flove.org subdomains, entangled applications launcher) aimed to promote loveliness in each of the layers of life, as reducted here (while they still being flexible and expansible).


Authorship disclaimer

Coco is a human-person (hi!) who is evolving flove documentation very much with some other people found along his nomad way of life. He has further specified each flove through one mindmap representing a software powered form, for thereafter launch such interactive platforms through flove.org subdomains.


The models expressed up to now (as happening with the “life set”) are b(i)ased by the strategic implementation view (aesthetical heuristics willing to be consensual-natural-universal about what has maximum meaning, minimum message lenght and minimmum learning curve) of one person: coco.


The keywords used for the making of the life table have been choosed through the gradual evolution of the mind of the author during his studying of the different subjects. Also note that beyond his study of edgy achademical researchs and keywording of wikipedia-etc pages introducing different scientific fields, he has also reached to review words lists such as the most common words, the most positive words, etc.


He has his own personal aesthetical tricks, intuitions and faithful bettings, which obviously could fail into being considered wishful or unaccurate for the purpose expressed. However, here is the-his stand, very much open to be enhaced by others' addons, revisions or plain criticism.

Basically, all this introductory bloaty chpater is only useful to finally say that:

Obviously and nevertheless, this is only an initial one-man-work, so it is not a final one-man-show (so see you!)


See also: wowwiki making of, flove making of




How flove is made

See below step-by-step how this default life view with the floves in it is done:


Ontology: Layers

We tend to call the whole as the universe. But this universe we say to represent the whole is not only one verse, it is already composed by two elements-verses:

  1. Unobservable universe
  2. Observable universe

For a better understanding of the difference between this two things, we can better name that these 2 primary elements as:

  1. Universe (Unobservable universe)
  2. Nature (Observable universe)

So by referring to whatever we (can) observe (i.e. Nature) we have to take into mind that such Nature is more accurately speaking:

  1. Nature (+Universe)

Or, in synonim words, everything (the whole) is basically composed of:

  1. Nature we see (+ Universe we don't see)


Constants, dyads and triads

With Universe and Nature we have a primary dyad, that we could also merge in a constant: universal nature and-or natural universe as the primary dual constants. But this primary dyad has in it a third component: the observer. So this primarity (nature and universe) besides necesarily having to be a dyad (and not only an absolute -unique- concept or keyword), are (necessarily have to be) also a triad:

  1. Universe
  2. Nature
  3. Observer


Simultaneous retrograde process

In this list (universe, nature, observer) we are assuming an order, which we could call it to be from top to bottom, or natural order. But is it the universe (first element) primary or more important than the observer (third element)?. There could be or What would it be for nature or the universe without a more initial observer?. We may never know the reply to this answer, and our hierarchic-linear views-beliefs look correct while they are also very obviously unsufficiently reasonable... let's try to fix this adding a precious challenge to our natural view by ordering that primary in the inverse way:

  1. Observer
  2. Nature
  3. Universe

The first way of ordering the three primary elements is the positive order as exposed by reason-centered heliocentric science and the second way it is the stand of biocentric geocentric spirituality. This second ordered list, as the one from above, also makes perfect sense to be corretc. So we have two ways of describing reality that are opposite but both are perfectly correct. So we have a big question to reply here: Where is common sense then?

The challenging reply is that both processes happen at the time. Simultaneity... A simultaneous retrograde process from top-to-down and from down-to-top is what forms every natural thing we see. It happens at every list of elements you will like to order in a natural way. To our perception is easier to do it from top-to-down, to our mind it is easier to understand it the way back. Both reason and mind work at the same time, with nature or reality being its product... It could look awkard, but it is the most consensual possible view for any and all.


A successful theory should frame both heliocentric and geocentric coordinate systems in a single model -- A. Einstein



Further and still reasonable viewings: Ranks are not hierarchies

There are as many posible views as ways there are to order the ranks a triad. This means ranks are just perceptual sensation, and not naturally hierarchical, while hierarchizing ranks is still a very useful exercise for understanding Nature. So we should also analize other ways beyond these two ways from top-to-down and from down-to-top that we already saw-analized.

1. Nature as a center. Universe and Observer as complementary polarities of it, because Natural is the second element at both views. More visually speaking imagine Natural as the vertice of a equilateral triangle, where Observer and Universe are alternated vertices of the hipotenusa. This means two triangles in superposition where the vertices on the hipotenusa change while the equilateral vertice doesn't. This is a very useful view, since both Universe and Observer are in fact perceptual imaginary subproducts of the only factual perceptual element there is: which is Nature (what we really observe from all we don't-can't observe).


2. Universe = Nature + Observer (or Observer = Nature + Universe)

We will analize further this view later in the analogies chapter, since this view is a very much clear and understandable analogy for what has been theorized long time ago with the naming of: Dao = Yin + Yang


Other posible ways to view the triad are also perfectly correct. I.e.

Nature, universe, observer
Universe, observer, nature
Observer, universe, nature
...

For a better clarification of the overall picture we will consider these other ways aesthetical-tactical mixtures of the 4 ways that we already saw-analized. This will be further explained later in the analogies chapter. For now, it is only wished to have given a enough consistent ground for justifying why we are choosing the Universe, nature, observer order as the default one. One additional reason that it is maybe important to add is because seems like the most comfortable way for our human viewing, which despite being the most complex matter (in the down-to-bottom view-process part) and also knowing that our unobserved or mind is much powerful than our reasoning, we tend to see ourselves with the eyes of our own reasoning only. Said in other words the Universe belongs to the metaphysical level of things, Nature is the positivist side of things, and the Observer in this default view despite being where the third-last element (apparently the less important), it is still the final necessary bit for the bigger bits to exist.

Positivist reasoning is framed in this sense. Positivism doesn't involve the definition nor the position of metaphysics in its theorizing and consider humans as just another bit. This is perfectly fine and reasonable, since metephysics is a matter beyond reasoning, and it is through an extended reasoning, and not through metaphysics, the way we are expressing our view of the whole. We are also separing elements for a better viewing on how they are all interconnected. This is, was and always will be the business of the metaphysical field that is the basis of physics: Ontology. The importance of ontology is the best proof of the intetwinning between metaphysicis and physics. We have to overcome antagonizing both fields, we rather see them both as refined polarities of the same thing. We hope the chossing of this default order for a view of the whole helps in that sense.



Aesthetical refinements

For raising a higher consensus at this primary view of the whole, we will do two aesthetical tweaks: 1. We will rename observer into biology (more accurate research) for by the way, 2. phrasing these three elements with the better sounding -al suffix for each of them:

  1. Universal
  2. Natural
  3. Biological



Loosing consensus while increasing understanding: Extending layers

The more we extend, the more consensus we could loose, but the deeper understanding we could reach too. So having this in mind, let's not let the need for a rigourous consensual objective to decrease our subjective research will for a deeper understanding of it all...


We can extend the layers into a list Minimal layers:

  1. Universal
    1. Vital
    2. Relational
    3. Perfectional
  2. Natural
    1. Fundamental
      1. Observational
      2. Temporal
      3. Spatial
    2. Formal
    3. Mechanical
  3. Biological
    1. Organical
    2. Communicational
      1. Sensorial
        1. Emotional
        2. Sensual
        3. Sexual
      2. Mental
      3. Rational
        1. Personal
        2. Local
        3. Social
    3. Economical
      1. Productional
        1. Extractional
        2. Manufactural
        3. Servicial
      2. Technical
      3. Beneficial




Let's extend them more: Basic layers:

  1. Universal
    1. Vital
      1. Foundational
      2. Intentional
      3. Processual
    2. Relational
      1. Enigmatical
      2. Imitational
      3. Transformational
    3. Perfectional
      1. Precisional
      2. Programational
      3. Architectural
  2. Natural
    1. Fundamental
      1. Observational
      2. Temporal
      3. Spatial
    2. Formal
      1. Elemental
      2. Directional
      3. Material
    3. Mechanical
      1. Functional
      2. Implosional
      3. Expansional
  3. Biological
    1. Organical
      1. Anatomical
      2. Physiological
      3. Morphological
    2. Communicational
      1. Sensorial
        1. Emotional
        2. Sensual
        3. Sexual
      2. Mental
        1. Existential
        2. Internal
        3. External
      3. Rational
        1. Personal
          1. Trascendental
          2. Aesthetical
          3. Logical
        2. Local
          1. Environtmental
          2. Tactical
          3. Ethical
        3. Social
          1. Organizational
          2. Estrategical
          3. Moral
    3. Economical
      1. Productional
        1. Extractional
        2. Manufactural
        3. Servicial
      2. Technical
        1. Negotiational
        2. Convertional
        3. Deal
      3. Beneficial
        1. Altruistical
        2. Communal
        3. Commercial




Let's keep extending them up to a self asssumed end point: All layers:

  1. Universal
    1. Vital
      1. Foundational
      2. Intentional
      3. Processual
    2. Relational
      1. Enigmatical
      2. Imitational
      3. Transformational
    3. Perfectional
      1. Precisional
      2. Programational
      3. Architectural
  2. Natural
    1. Fundamental
      1. Observational
        1. Detectional
        2. Interpretational
        3. Perceptional
      2. Temporal
        1. Global
        2. Actual
        3. Artificial
      3. Spatial
        1. Total
        2. Microscopical
        3. Macroscopical
    2. Formal
      1. Elemental
        1. Positional
        2. Reciprocal
        3. Structural
      2. Directional
        1. Inertial
        2. Orbital
        3. Traslational
      3. Material
        1. Geometrical
        2. Musical
        3. Chemical
    3. Mechanical
      1. Functional
        1. Analitical
        2. Qualitational
        3. Quantitational
      2. Implosional
        1. Phenomenal
        2. Theoretical
        3. Practical
      3. Expansional
        1. Computational
        2. Physical
        3. Mathematical
  3. Biological
    1. Organical
      1. Anatomical
        1. Connectional
        2. Genetical
        3. Epigenetical
      2. Physiological
        1. Nerval
        2. Neural
        3. Hormonal
      3. Morphological
        1. Vegetal
        2. Animal
        3. Sapiental
    2. Communicational
      1. Sensorial
        1. Emotional
        2. Sensual
        3. Sexual
      2. Mental
        1. Existential
          1. Experiential
          2. Experimental
          3. Explorational
        2. Internal
          1. Recognitial
          2. Attentional
          3. Psicological
        3. External
          1. Operational
          2. Adaptational
          3. Behavioural
      3. Rational
        1. Personal
          1. Trascendental
            1. Passional
            2. Spiritual
            3. Intelectual
          2. Aesthetical
            1. Inspirational
            2. Artistical
            3. Reputational
          3. Logical
            1. Referential
            2. Propositional
            3. Constructional
        2. Local
          1. Environtmental
            1. Special
            2. Grupal
            3. Territorial
          2. Tactical
            1. Optimal
            2. Original
            3. Potential
          3. Ethical
            1. Educational
            2. Cultural
            3. Political
        3. Social
          1. Organizational
            1. Consensual
            2. Contactual
            3. Contractual
          2. Estrategical
            1. Ideal
            2. Mutual
            3. Projectional
          3. Moral
            1. Constitutional
            2. Administrational
            3. Institutional
      4. Economical
        1. Productional
          1. Extractional
          2. Manufactural
          3. Servicial
        2. Technical
          1. Negotiational
          2. Convertional
          3. Deal
        3. Beneficial
          1. Altruistical
          2. Communal
          3. Commercial





Prescriptions into descriptions: Floves into layers

All layers look descriptive, so we can complement them with more prescriptive companions. Flove is how we call this prescriptions for the descriptions, or in more simple words: Flove are the lovely expressions (or actions) of any layer, i.e:

  1. Universal --> Flow
  2. Natural --> Real
  3. Biological --> Agency




Initial consensual hard tests: Flove language

Let's try-test how consensual this sounds:

Everything is...

1. The universal flow has a natural reality which is the biological agency... (from top-to-down)

and-or :

2. The biological agency of a natural reality in the universal flow... (from down-to-top)

and-or:

3, The natural reality is a biological agency of the universal flow... (central centered)


and-or:

4. The natural flow of biological reality is the universal agency... (twisted..)


If this sounds consensual to you, and to everyone you can imagine of, we are threading fine...



Let's now create one lovely expression for each layer:

Life
Layer Lovely
1 Universal femenine
1.1 Vital flow
1.1.1 Foundational emerge
1.1.2 Intentional merge
1.1.3 Processual converge
1.2 Relational harmony
1.2.1 Enigmatical hint
1.2.2 Imitational dynamic
1.2.3 Transformational pattern
1.3 Perfectional simple
1.3.1 Precisional unite
1.3.2 Programational constant
1.3.3 Architectural current
2 Natural real
2.1 Fundamental essence
2.1.1 Observational intract
2.1.1.1 Detectional clear
2.1.1.2 Interpretational unknowable
2.1.1.3 Perceptional deep
2.1.2 Temporal mesh
2.1.2.1 Global phase
2.1.2.2 Actual now
2.1.2.3 Artificial eternal
2.1.3 Spatial wave
2.1.3.1 Total load
2.1.3.2 Microscopical particle
2.1.3.3 Macroscopical infinite
2.2 Formal shape
2.2.1 Elemental layer
2.2.1.1 Positional center
2.2.1.2 Reciprocal hybrid
2.2.1.3 Structural nuclear
2.2.2 Directional pull
2.2.2.1 Inertial deaccelerate
2.2.2.2 Orbital spin
2.2.2.3 Traslational axis
2.2.3 Material magnetic
2.2.3.1 Geometrical fractal
2.2.3.2 Musical vibrate
2.2.3.3 Chemical magic
2.3 Mechanical cause
2.3.1 Functional trend
2.3.1.1 Analitical deep
2.3.1.2 Qualitational better
2.3.1.3 Quantitational amazing
2.3.2 Implosional inner
2.3.2.1 Phenomenal foresee
2.3.2.2 Theoretical posible
2.3.2.3 Practical certain
2.3.3 Expansional able
2.3.3.1 Computational hack
2.3.3.2 Physical shift
2.3.3.3 Mathematical principle
3 Biological agency *
3.1 Organical thrive
3.1.1 Anatomical compose
3.1.1.1 Connectional nucleus
3.1.1.2 Genetical go
3.1.1.3 Epigenetical return
3.1.2 Physiological sentient
3.1.2.1 Nerval afferent
3.1.2.2 Neural analogy
3.1.2.3 Hormonal relay
3.1.3 Morphological soul
3.1.3.1 Vegetal spore
3.1.3.2 Animal gland
3.1.3.3 Sapiental talent
3.2 Communicational sign
3.2.1 Sensorial touch
3.2.1.1 Emotional intense
3.2.1.2 Sensual excite
3.2.1.3 Sexual orgasm
3.2.2 Mental lead *
3.2.2.1 Existential subtle
3.2.2.1.1 Experiential love
3.2.2.1.2 Experimental joy
3.2.2.1.3 Explorational wise
3.2.2.2 Internal aware *
3.2.2.2.1 Recognitial cheer
3.2.2.2.2 Attentional cute
3.2.2.2.3 Psicological select
3.2.2.3 External guess *
3.2.2.3.1 Operational act
3.2.2.3.2 Adaptational convenient
3.2.2.3.3 Behavioural choose
3.2.3 Rational accept *
3.2.3.1 Personal be *
3.2.3.1.1 Trascendental pure
3.2.3.1.1.1 Passional intend
3.2.3.1.1.2 Spiritual faith
3.2.3.1.1.3 Intelectual smart
3.2.3.1.2 Aesthetical nice
3.2.3.1.2.1 Inspirational fresh
3.2.3.1.2.2 Artistical style
3.2.3.1.2.3 Reputational merit
3.2.3.1.3 Logical right
3.2.3.1.3.1 Referential stand
3.2.3.1.3.2 Propositional manifest
3.2.3.1.3.3 Constructional humble
3.2.3.2 Local trustful *
3.2.3.2.1 Environtmental kind
3.2.3.2.1.1 Special equal
3.2.3.2.1.2 Grupal intimate
3.2.3.2.1.3 Territorial relative
3.2.3.2.2 Tactical quick
3.2.3.2.2.1 Optimal match
3.2.3.2.2.2 Original new
3.2.3.2.2.3 Potential wow
3.2.3.2.3 Ethical pleasant
3.2.3.2.3.1 Educational habit
3.2.3.2.3.2 Cultural adore
3.2.3.2.3.3 Political skill
3.2.3.3 Social free *
3.2.3.3.1 Organizational cohesion
3.2.2.3.3.1.1 Consensual agree
3.2.3.3.1.2 Contactual embrace
3.2.3.3.1.3 Contractual access
3.2.3.3.2 Estrategical plan
3.2.3.3.2.1 Ideal value
3.2.3.3.2.2 Mutual common
3.2.3.3.2.3 Projectional advance
3.2.3.3.3 Moral promote
3.2.3.3.3.1 Constitutional order
3.2.3.3.3.2 Administrational enforce
3.2.3.3.3.3 Institutional private
3.3 Economical do *
3.3.1 Productional keep
3.3.1.1 Extractional compensate *
3.3.1.2 Manufactural make
3.3.1.3 Servicial offer *
3.3.2 Technical note
3.3.3.1 Negotiational tacit
3.3.3.2 Convertional ori
3.3.3.3 Deal direct *
3.3.3 Beneficial get
3.3.2.1 Altruistical freed *
3.3.2.2 Communal share *
3.3.2.3 Commercial swap *



We can also polarize the flove lovely expressions adding far lovely expressions:

Life
Layer Lovely Far lovely
1 Universal femenine masculine
1.1 Vital flow surf
1.1.1 Foundational emerge create
1.1.2 Intentional merge tune
1.1.3 Processual converge complement
1.2 Relational harmony equilibrium
1.2.1 Enigmatical hint seek
1.2.2 Imitational dynamic reproduce
1.2.3 Transformational pattern evolution
1.3 Perfectional simple complex
1.3.1 Precisional unite separate
1.3.2 Programational constant dual
1.3.3 Architectural current integral
2 Natural real positive
2.1 Fundamental essence substance
2.1.1 Observational intract react
2.1.1.1 Detectional clear clean
2.1.1.2 Interpretational unknowable unobservable
2.1.1.3 Perceptional deep mean
2.1.2 Temporal mesh leap
2.1.2.1 Global phase timeline
2.1.2.2 Actual now present
2.1.2.3 Artificial eternal linear
2.1.3 Spatial wave density
2.1.3.1 Total load full
2.1.3.2 Microscopical particle atom
2.1.3.3 Macroscopical infinite cosmos
2.2 Formal shape shell
2.2.1 Elemental layer dimension
2.2.1.1 Positional center peripheral
2.2.1.2 Reciprocal hybrid lattice
2.2.1.3 Structural nuclear distribute
2.2.2 Directional pull push
2.2.2.1 Inertial deaccelerate accelerate
2.2.2.2 Orbital spin radial
2.2.2.3 Traslational axis path
2.2.3 Material magnetic electric
2.2.3.1 Geometrical fractal torus
2.2.3.2 Musical vibrate resonate
2.2.3.3 Chemical magic miracle
2.3 Mechanical cause effect
2.3.1 Functional trend regulate
2.3.1.1 Analitical deep mean
2.3.1.2 Qualitational better best
2.3.1.3 Quantitational amazing awesome
2.3.2 Implosional inner concentrate
2.3.2.1 Phenomenal foresee predict
2.3.2.2 Theoretical posible probable
2.3.2.3 Practical certain exact
2.3.3 Expansional able enable
2.3.3.1 Computational hack flaw
2.3.3.2 Physical shift paradigm
2.3.3.3 Mathematical principle equation
3 Biological agency * presence
3.1 Organical thrive strive
3.1.1 Anatomical compose vertebrate
3.1.1.1 Connectional nucleus cytoplasm
3.1.1.2 Genetical go unique
3.1.1.3 Epigenetical return inmune
3.1.2 Physiological sentient magnify
3.1.2.1 Nerval afferent efferent
3.1.2.2 Neural analogy emphasis
3.1.2.3 Hormonal relay amplify
3.1.3 Morphological soul body
3.1.3.1 Vegetal spore flower
3.1.3.2 Animal gland mammal
3.1.3.3 Sapiental talent human
3.2 Communicational sign meme
3.2.1 Sensorial touch view
3.2.1.1 Emotional intense extense
3.2.1.2 Sensual excite transfer
3.2.1.3 Sexual orgasm transmit
3.2.2 Mental lead * true *
3.2.2.1 Existential subtle hope
3.2.2.1.1 Experiential love wish
3.2.2.1.2 Experimental joy fun
3.2.2.1.3 Explorational wise care
3.2.2.2 Internal aware * fit
3.2.2.2.1 Recognitial cheer like
3.2.2.2.2 Attentional cute feed
3.2.2.2.3 Psicological select enhance
3.2.2.3 External guess * imagine *
3.2.2.3.1 Operational act perform
3.2.2.3.2 Adaptational convenient adequate
3.2.2.3.3 Behavioural choose integrate
3.2.3 Rational accept * rate *
3.2.3.1 Personal be * single *
3.2.3.1.1 Trascendental pure depurate
3.2.3.1.1.1 Passional intend expect
3.2.3.1.1.2 Spiritual faith sacred
3.2.3.1.1.3 Intelectual smart perform
3.2.3.1.2 Aesthetical nice beautiful
3.2.3.1.2.1 Inspirational fresh charm
3.2.3.1.2.2 Artistical style way
3.2.3.1.2.3 Reputational merit fame
3.2.3.1.3 Logical right rigour
3.2.3.1.3.1 Referential stand format
3.2.3.1.3.2 Propositional manifest goal
3.2.3.1.3.3 Constructional humble honest
3.2.3.2 Local trustful * peace
3.2.3.2.1 Environtmental kind affect
3.2.3.2.1.1 Special equal close
3.2.3.2.1.2 Grupal intimate mate
3.2.3.2.1.3 Territorial relative neighbour
3.2.3.2.2 Tactical quick prefer
3.2.3.2.2.1 Optimal match basic
3.2.3.2.2.2 Original new challenge
3.2.3.2.2.3 Potential wow edgy
3.2.3.2.3 Ethical pleasant cool
3.2.3.2.3.1 Educational habit hobby
3.2.3.2.3.2 Cultural adore admire
3.2.3.2.3.3 Political skill sharp
3.2.3.3 Social free * fair
3.2.3.3.1 Organizational cohesion resolve
3.2.2.3.3.1.1 Consensual agree convince
3.2.3.3.1.2 Contactual embrace engage
3.2.3.3.1.3 Contractual access allow
3.2.3.3.2 Estrategical plan convenient
3.2.3.3.2.1 Ideal value virtue
3.2.3.3.2.2 Mutual common given
3.2.3.3.2.3 Projectional advance achieve
3.2.3.3.3 Moral promote propose
3.2.3.3.3.1 Constitutional order formalize
3.2.3.3.3.2 Administrational enforce federate
3.2.3.3.3.3 Institutional private public
3.3 Economical do * use
3.3.1 Productional keep manage
3.3.1.1 Extractional compensate * restore
3.3.1.2 Manufactural make craft
3.3.1.3 Servicial offer * license *
3.3.2 Technical note acomplish
3.3.3.1 Negotiational tacit cheap
3.3.3.2 Convertional ori cash
3.3.3.3 Deal direct * flevy
3.3.3 Beneficial get acquire
3.3.2.1 Altruistical freed * favor
3.3.2.2 Communal share * partake *
3.3.2.3 Commercial swap * credit



Extending the dual triads with explicit moralities: Bright and Shade

To every Layer we have added a Flove keyword to it. We have selected to add an keyword guided by Aesthetic & Moral principles we want to promote. The moral aesthethics of adding Floves into Layers has been: Complementarity (not antagonist). This is fine, but not fine enough because by integrating antagonisms we will better understand closely this whole we want to express. So to the Layers and Floves we have defined, let's add two additional triads with antagonist moral aesthetics to each, for helping us understanding closely each of the expression and the whole process:


Brigth: Source --> Evolve --> Express

Shade: Lack --> Twist --> Excesss

Where each, i.e. Source, is one pole that has its antagonist pole, i.e. Lack: The more Source the less Lack


Life

Bright>>>

Flove

Shade<<<

Source Evolve Express Lovely _ Far Excess Twist Lack
1 Universal active change bring femenine _ masculine stress static final
2 Natural matrix light energy real _ positive entropy dark void
3 Biological alive tissue metabolism agency * _ presence organism exit death



Life full set

The following table is a fully triadic life set:

Life

Bright>>>

Flove

Shade<<<

Source Evolve Express Lovely _ Far Excess Twist Lack
1 Universal active change bring flow _ surf stress static final
1.1 Vital activate motion tension femenine _ masculine god limbo ultimate
1.1.1 Foundational lentgh novel rise emerge _ create generate accident end
1.1.2 Intentional will design drive merge _ tune destiny dark void
1.1.3 Processual progress develop simultaneous converge _ complement paralel retrograde break
1.2 Relational connect automate determinism harmony _ equilibrium pseudo-equilibrium non-equilibrium chaos
1.2.1 Enigmatical mantain stable mistery unknowable _ unknown accident secret dissapear
1.2.2 Imitational compare adopt simulate dynamic _ reproduce emulate abandon obsolete
1.2.3 Transformational set fix ensemble pattern _ evolution rank erase singularity
1.3 Perfectional part branch diverse simple _ complex exagerate error none
1.3.1 Precisional supersimmetry scalar superposition unite _ separate omniverse multiverse asymmetry
1.3.2 Architectural unity pair triad plural _ dual issolate unlike random
1.3.3 Programational holon polar vortex constant _ current tesseract appart outer
2 Natural matrix light energy real _ positive entropy luck karma
2.1 Fundamental issue subject object essence _ substance thing almighty confusion
2.1.1 Observational fuzzy prism find intract _ react blurry vague opaque
2.1.1.1 Detectional notice vary get clear _ clean issolate doubt miss
2.1.1.2 Attentional reveal assume hint deep _ seek ilussion fiction dismiss
2.1.1.3 Perceptional validate understand sight mean _ learn falsiable infalsiable false
2.1.2 Temporal quantum entangle momentum mesh _ leap differ tunnel nothing
2.1.2.1 Global appear aggregate pace phase _ timeline due degradate ephemeral
2.1.2.2 Actual sudden option chance now _ present opportunity postpone crunch
2.1.2.3 Artificial origin cycle history eternal _ linear era loop absence
2.1.3 Spatial horizon event charge wave _ density mass gravity hole
2.1.3.1 Total landscape bound size load _ full whole boundary empty
2.1.3.2 Microscopical neutron proton electron particle _ atom field bosson antimatter
2.1.3.3 Macroscopical content container broad infinite _ cosmos abroad unobserved alien
2.2 Formal quark manifold string shape _ shell superstring darkmatter vacuum
2.2.1 Elemental entity type range layer _ dimension rank contrary ghost
2.2.1.1 Positional vertice graph node center _ peripheral zone black lost
2.2.1.2 Reciprocal localize junct reflect hybrid _ lattice correspondence disjunct delocalize
2.2.1.3 Structural spectrum coordinate coherence nuclear _ distribute decoherence distort revert
2.2.2 Directional trajectory transport movement pull _ push alternate wander lose
2.2.2.1 Inertial filter bend conductance deaccelerate _ accelerate impedance curve stop
2.2.2.2 Refractional angular geodesy tangent spin _ radial tranverse centripetal linear
2.2.2.3 Reflectional point vector path axis _ coord circuit centrifugal crash
2.2.3 Material soil plasma matter magnetic _ electric fluid viscous foam
2.2.3.1 Geometrical image trace spiral fractal _ torus sphere plain empty
2.2.3.2 Musical tone rythm acoustic vibrate _ resonate cymatic noise disrupt
2.2.3.3 Chemical property valence thermic magic _ miracle temperature dissipate dissolve
2.3 Mechanical swift medium formula cause _ effect meassure apparatus force
2.3.1 Functional expose correct decorate derivate _ regulate disturb defect impose
2.3.1.1 Analitical raw info data integral _ trend stat mess spam
2.3.1.2 Qualitational good pretty relevant best _ better spoil ugly bad
2.3.1.3 Quantitational big huge great amazing _ awesome brutal pitty crazy
2.3.2 Implosional attract absorb accumulate inner _ concentrate exceed suck repulse
2.3.2.1 Phenomenal scope context explain foresee _ predict reduct yard eliminate
2.3.2.2 Theoretical reach focus discourse posible _ probable odd absurd imposible
2.3.2.3 Practical test regular evidence certain _ exact rigid critic overload
2.3.3 Expansional graph increment grow able _ enable escape inflate explode
2.3.3.1 Computational run command patch hack _ flaw bug exploit crack
2.3.3.2 Physical sequence modulation frequency shift _ paradigm calibrate interfere collapse
2.3.3.3 Mathematical conjecture hypothesis axiom principle _ equation theorem paradox oax
3 Biological alive tissue metabolism agency * _ presence organism exit death
3.1 Organical cell protein aminoacid thrive _ strive duct age hurt
3.1.1 Anatomical embryon bond compound compose _ vertebrate skeleton bacteria virus
3.1.1.1 Connectional eukaryot membrane mithocondria nucleus _ cytoplasm germ pathogen disease
3.1.1.2 Genetical genome DNA herit go _ unique ancestor silencer injury
3.1.1.3 Epigenetical phenotype RNA lively return _ inmune survive starve suicide
3.1.2 Physiological alert exponent homeostasis sentient _ magnify brain opponent inert
3.1.2.1 Nerval axon fiber tract afferent _ efferent duct pathology pain
3.1.2.2 Neural memory synapsis tube analogy _ emphasis crest madness anxiety
3.1.2.3 Hormonal secrete receive circulate relay _ amplify transport hold breakdown
3.1.3 Morphological dimorphic genital gender soul _ body queer hermafrodite asexual
3.1.3.1 Vegetal chloroplast photosyntesis cellulose spore _ flower lignin kin niche
3.1.3.2 Animal anaeroby breath eat gland _ mammal depredate inflamate deform
3.1.3.3 Sapiental meridian erect dexter talent _ human neoteny regress unbalance
3.2 Communicational abundant message symbol sign _ meme spam hurt scarce
3.2.1 Sensorial taste cautious align touch _ view belong danger poison
3.2.1.1 Emotional involve affect enlighten intense _ extense manipulate hijack deceive
3.2.1.2 Sensual introspect influence stimulate excite _ transfer somatize disguise disregard
3.2.1.3 Sexual extrospect flirt wank orgasm _ transmit fuck abuse explode
3.2.2 Mental attach interest bias lead * _ true * discover forget vice
3.2.2.1 Existential think sample example subtle _ hope belief deny fake
3.2.2.1.1 Experiential need desire want love _ wish zeal rage fear
3.2.2.1.2 Experimental play enjoy feel joy _ fun flaw sorrow bore
3.2.2.1.3 Explorational idea balance code wise _ care core worry fight
3.2.2.2 Internal poiesis memesis simbiosis aware * _ fit split damage suffer
3.2.2.2.1 Sensational dare sane greet cheer _ like greed poison danger
3.2.2.2.2 Interpretational forge agile tender cute _ feed nurture tight split
3.2.2.2.3 Psicological identify purpose pursue select _ choose quest idiocy anxiety
3.2.2.3 External abstract draw concretize guess * _ imagine * overflow disflow misflow
3.2.2.3.1 Operational basis approach commit act _ perform polite delete purge
3.2.2.3.2 Adaptational comply persuade induce convenient _ adequate dominate submission risk
3.2.2.3.3 Behavioural aptitude attitude diligence improve _ enhance conflict strike boycott
3.2.3 Rational specify reason consciouss accept * _ rate * mania calculus mistake
3.2.3.1 Personal self egolatry selfsteem be * _ single * selfish narcisim psychopathy
3.2.3.1.1 Trascendental serve cult divine pure _ depurate ghost master absolute
3.2.3.1.1.1 Passional impulse fantasy dream intend _ expect mission gregarious disfavor
3.2.3.1.1.2 Spiritual paradise worship confess faith _ sacred religion dogma hell
3.2.3.1.1.3 Intelectual myth speech inteligence smart _ perform skeptic troll flame
3.2.3.1.2 Aesthetical bliss recall fine nice _ beautiful fetish inflate saturate
3.2.3.1.2.1 Inspirational open motivate viral fresh _ charm contagiate depress shut
3.2.3.1.2.2 Artistical drift artifact method style _ way version weapon hostile
3.2.3.1.2.3 Reputational mention account prestige merit _ fame status assault crime
3.2.3.1.3 Logical ground guide frame right _ rigour cage abuse absolute
3.2.3.1.3.1 Referential proof fact standard stand _ format static false wishful
3.2.3.1.3.2 Propositional release incite suggest manifest _ goal imply forbid terror
3.2.3.1.3.3 Constructional type archetype bundle humble _ honest bloat rare pitty
3.2.3.2 Local empathy synchrony synergy trust * _ peace simpathy rival hate
3.2.3.2.1 Environtmental instinct domesticate compromise kind _ affect civilizate savage depredate
3.2.3.2.1.1 Special trait mutate lineage equal _ close race disregard extinct
3.2.3.2.1.2 Grupal known friend family intimate _ mate companion enemy gang
3.2.3.2.1.3 Territorial homestead class region relative _ neighbour nation foreign strange
3.2.3.2.2 Tactical flexible adjust efficient quick _ prefer affect perturb worsen
3.2.3.2.2.1 Optimal competent favorable addon match _ basic accesory pasive off
3.2.3.2.2.2 Original hot easy warm new _ challenge catch difficult cold
3.2.3.2.2.3 Potential surprise inflexion peak wow _ edgy extreme geek freak
3.2.3.2.3 Ethical dignity honour respect pleasant _ cool pride deception insult
3.2.3.2.3.1 Educational teach pragma course habit _ hobby curse mandate misguide
3.2.3.2.3.2 Cultural role character tradition adore _ admire folklore spoil defeat
3.2.3.2.3.3 Political let mediate responsive skill _ sharp responsible rigid paralize
3.2.3.3 Social articulate network norm free * _ fair terms imped force
3.2.3.3.1 Organizational prevent secure settle cohesion _ resolve arbitrate ban violence
3.2.2.3.3.1.1 Consensual permit consent just agree _ convince reject obligate crime
3.2.3.3.1.2 Contactual shelter assist join embrace _ engage depend perjudicate trap
3.2.3.3.1.3 Contractual claim disclaim promise access _ allow prescribe reject dismantle
3.2.3.3.2 Estrategical defend target uthopy plan _ convenient disthopy plot offend
3.2.3.3.2.1 Ideal important promote capacity value _ virtue grace defect banal
3.2.3.3.2.2 Mutual cooperate collabore duty common _ given compassion taint compete
3.2.3.3.2.3 Projectional pretend target concern advance _ achieve expect obsses guilt
3.2.3.3.3 Moral power publicity declare promote _ propose press censor oppress
3.2.3.3.3.1 Constitutional represent protect law order _ formalize convention punish jail
3.2.3.3.3.2 Administrational rule control safeguard enforce _ federate circumvent burden fall
3.2.3.3.3.3 Institutional vote moderate reform private _ public revolt execute army
3.3 Economical resource allocate redistribute do * _ use posses speculate owner
3.3.1 Productional tool innovate device keep _ manage stuff margin trash
3.3.1.1 Extractional mine store preserve compensate * _ restore restitute pollute expoliate
3.3.1.2 Manufactural build artisan work make _ craft job slave destroy
3.3.1.3 Servicial brand invite convey offer * _ license * market consume capital
3.3.2 Technical available request notate note _ acomplish beg hide dispose
3.3.3.1 Negotiational estate marketing ad tacit _ cheap bid lobby boss
3.3.3.2 Convertional deed bond firm ori _ cash currency fiat money
3.3.3.3 Deal sell pay buy direct * _ flevy fee debt swindle
3.3.3 Beneficial warrant condition clause get _ acquire premium bribe rob
3.3.2.1 Altruistical give contribute gift freed * _ favor donate bill loss
3.3.2.2 Communal cost crew lend share * _ partake * lease hire usury
3.3.2.3 Commercial price benefit exchange swap * _ credit earn lucre monopolize


This life view is more easy to debate, adapt and extend than others (see it full).



Main axioms

Higher or lower ranked (f)loves (flows) are (always) vibrating more or less intensevely but equivalently in the (limited) layers of life through a certain simultaneous evolvable processing of bright and shade.


Bright vibrates more flove if less sibling shade and more upper floves vibrate along


We can't vibrate all bright in all dimensions at once and this causes shades to be redeemed (evolving them to be less shady)


We have vibrating manias based in our gender, personal history, cultural and social influences and more specially based in present shade we view not being redeemed in our local and global environtment


Lovely (and far lovely) are flove heuristic deontologies while print (the highest flove) is still only a part of a perceptual faith


Science is (still, only) (descriptive) code that easily vibrates truth. But science will never view-know-code it all and missed or remaining truths will rely on faith. So science is useful for extending (making more lovely) the (normal universal, natural, human) experiencing of faith, the highest experienceable free will, within a deterministic framework (needed for the stability of the whole).




"All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree. --- Albert Einstein"





Process

Process is first child of life expressing how energy will be vibrating in dimensions


Vibrations flow through ranks . (We humans view it as a multitrack process, in permanent editorial revision where we have the will to disflow for experimenting its varieties)


Bright goes to flove, and then leaves a print


Flove forms bright sources in its lower layer



The more bright source as higher flove has been


The more bright source, the less lack shade and the more possible evolution


The more bright evolution, the less twist shade and the more possible expression


The more bright expression, the less excess shade and the more possible lovely and far lovely expressions


Otherwise, actual twisted shade will go to lack instead of going to excess and far lovely. This would make lower flows flowing shader because of this upper shade vibration, and will cause an acceleration for the expression of equivalent brightness starting to be felt in such shadier body, which if refused will come to be expressed through other related or far bodies to the shady ones.




See more: process phrases




"Life is an offensive, directed against the repetitious of the Universe" -- A. Whitehead






Ranks

Ranks are expressed by comparing the position of concepts within the whole view: upper, broader and-or most wanted or brighter are ways to identify ranking. Ranks do exist to our natural reason since i.e. we are more afraid of death than of worry, we are more likely to like to be more often happy than being sad the majority of our time. So ranks are basically finally expressing how much bright should deserve each vibration in life compared to another.

But despite its rank and this following affirmation that will posible be very polemic to our reasoning: every vibration is relative to the rest of others, so ranks are perceptions and not strict hierarchies i.e. death is not universally worse than worry, being sad is not less important than being happy, etc.. . Nevertheless, and as said above, ranks do help us understand the and what matters most than other matters in our life.



See more: ranks phrases




"There are objective hierarchical (while relative) values beyond human experience --- Axiologysts Husserl, scheller, hartmann, (coco), etc"






Automating definitions: Flove language

The depth of this default view that is framing each concept in a ranked set with a defined process with direction and family help us for testing further its validity. Each concept is automatically defined, emptying-leaving no room for any oversubjective rethoric tweak. The more process definiton and extended dualities and-or triads, the more we are able to see the definitions of each concept, the easier we can validate it. I.e. If a definition of any of the concepts doesn't sound accurate to you or to anyone you can imagine of, that concept posibly needs to be changed (put in another place of the set).

Life is a process ranking parts of energy vibrating in dimensions


Flove is first child of energy coming from light and dark, (maybe) going to broader than flove and parent of print, lovely and far lovely


See more: how very basic life phrasing is made, this full estructure mindmap should help for establishing further linguistic conjunctions mechanisms




Analogies

Being strict doing lists only with pairs and triads help us for doing analogies. I.e. the gender analogy help us having interpretations with specific cross-perspectives within the global view.

1st child is vibrated equal by genders

2nd child is a more femaled vibration

3rd child is a more maled vibration

Get a dyad or triad that you know more, and use it as an analogy default for trying to understand other pairs you don't get that much. This also helps very much in testing the rigour of what is being exposed. We should be using the gender analogy at any dyad and triad since it is the referral more universally closer to any of us. The gender analogy is teaching us about both femenine and masculine vibrations being in us, in different ways of flowing since we have different biologies and cultural heritages. Even more specially speaking, the gender analogy is decissorily helping us to not lose the track of the evolutive continuum we are still into, that has been on at least since the begining of what we dare to call Observation, nature or universe.

Feel free to consider this bit the more magic or axiomatic bit of all of this theory. It works at every dyad or triad phrased in the past, and with any other you would phrase now or in the future. You, nor anyone won't scape of identifying what is feminity and masculinity than this ultra simple way we offered to you:

1st child is vibrated equal by genders

2nd child is a more femaled vibration

3rd child is a more maled vibration


Analogies within the full life table: The most real flight

Welcome onboard to flight number yourself. Dare to compare, i.e.

(any of the shade or brigth of) element number 2.3.2 with element 3.3.2.
2.1 + 2.1.1 + 2.1.1.1 are yet another triad...
...



Flove metrics

All this structural effort helps anyone being able to meassure the more or less flove that could be in any life event, i.e.


Metrics on shortalks

This table rates some people's short talks expressing flove in life with their own words.

Rovira Kuppers Yumbajo Wapnick Sinex
Process 2 _ 2 2 _
Rank 3 2 2 1 2
Vibrate all 3 3 3 4 1
Dark 1 2 4 3 2
1. Universal _ _ _ _ _
2. Natural _ _ _ _ _
3. Animal _ _ _ _ _
3.1 Mental 4 5 3 3 4
3.1.1. Passional 5 4 3 2 4
3.1.2 Cultural 3 3 3 4 2
3.1.3 Political 4 3 3 3 4
3.2 Rational 3 2 2 2 1
3.2.1 Personal 5 4 4 4 4
3.2.2 Local 3 2 1 _ _
3.2.3 Social 1 1 2 2 1
3.3. Economical _ 1 _ _ 3
3.3.1 Gift _ 4 _ _ _
3.3.2 Share _ 2 _ _ _
3.3.3 Exchange _ _ _ _ 4



Philosophers metrics

This table rates te flove vibrating of some philosopers from the past

Hegel Kierkegaard Marx Bakunin Nietzsche Jung
Process 3 3 4 3 4 4
Rank 3 2 3 4 4 4
Vibrate all 2 3 2 4 4 4
Dark 1 4 2 3 5 4
1. Universal 2 3 2 4 4 4
2. Natural 2 3 2 4 2 3
3. Animal 2 3 3 4 4 3
3.1 Mental 3 3 3 3 4 5
3.1.1. Passional 3 4 3 4 5 4
3.1.2 Cultural 4 4 4 4 4 4
3.1.3 Political 4 3 5 5 5 5
3.2 Rational 4 4 4 4 5 4
3.2.1 Personal 3 4 2 5 5 5
3.2.2 Local 1 2 2 5 2 3
3.2.3 Social 3 2 5 4 3 3
3.3. Economical 1 1 5 2 1 2
3.3.1 Gift 1 3 2 4 2 1
3.3.2 Share 1 3 2 4 2 2
3.3.3 Exchange 3 3 5 2 2 2




See also


Home in wikipedia



Go to the life page
Go to flove.org