Difference between revisions of "Shareful"

From Wowwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 8: Line 8:
 
==Shareful is==
 
==Shareful is==
 
#what people feel and view about it
 
#what people feel and view about it
#shareful is lovely sharing
+
#lovely sharing
 
#inviting to share
 
#inviting to share
  
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
{{SI}}
 
{{SI}}
 
This shareful default invitation can be custom limiting partial rights while keep permitting the rest of default very permissive interacting.
 
 
There is a set of limitations that can be choosed and anyone can also add their own custom limitations in the applications.
 
 
  
 
This default invitation being so short and love loaded is useful for
 
This default invitation being so short and love loaded is useful for
#sharing better the flow with people when coding relations
+
#better sharing the flow with people when coding their relations
 
#being understood and debated with the minimal posible learning curve by anyone barely knowing any english.
 
#being understood and debated with the minimal posible learning curve by anyone barely knowing any english.
#making settling interaction pleasant enough.
+
#making settling interaction pleasant enough (i.e. "anytime" not being easily gamed to "not now")
#not being easily gamed
 
 
 
  
  
Line 38: Line 31:
  
 
===Defaults, clauses and wills===
 
===Defaults, clauses and wills===
Shareful invitation defaults are varied and limited copies of the SI (i.e. shareful, just shareful, use with care, [[Full Shareful Invitation]] project, etc). Some of them are available in shareful applications where if you choose to custom a personal default shareful inviting by overwriting the SI then it might be labelled as "for sharing".
+
There are varied and limited copies of the SI (i.e. shareful, just shareful, use with care, [[Full Shareful Invitation]] project, etc). Some of these shareful inviting defaults are available in shareful applications where if you choose to custom a personal default shareful inviting by overwriting the SI, then your invinting might be labelled as "for sharing".
  
  
  
 
{{Shareful clause definition}}
 
{{Shareful clause definition}}
 +
There is a set of limitations that can be choosed and anyone can also add their own custom limitations in the applications.
 +
 
Shareful clauses are harming the [[shareful love]] but might make more comfortable most of the people in many contextual situations. Some shareful acts will start heavily claused and after gaining more confidence, they will be dropping some or all clauses later for that or for another thing.  
 
Shareful clauses are harming the [[shareful love]] but might make more comfortable most of the people in many contextual situations. Some shareful acts will start heavily claused and after gaining more confidence, they will be dropping some or all clauses later for that or for another thing.  
  
Line 61: Line 56:
  
 
====Settling clauses====
 
====Settling clauses====
Settling clauses are parameters ordering for settling disputes.  
+
Settling clauses are parameters ordering for settling disputes. There is a limited set of 5 ascending descending phrases in the default application.  
  
 
The settling clauses are useful for
 
The settling clauses are useful for
Line 70: Line 65:
  
  
The default settling core is  
+
The default settling is  
 
#"caring cheers" in the invitation
 
#"caring cheers" in the invitation
 
#"tell contact and bring it back" in the web form
 
#"tell contact and bring it back" in the web form
Line 76: Line 71:
  
  
The suggested default clausing for settling is  
+
The extended default clausing for settling is  
 
#"the one who more future lovely offers".  
 
#"the one who more future lovely offers".  
#"...,less things have at the present",  
+
#"..., less things have at the present",  
 
#"the one having been less user of the more similar things in the past",  
 
#"the one having been less user of the more similar things in the past",  
  
  
There is a limited set of 5 ascending descending phrases in the default application.
+
 
  
  
Line 114: Line 109:
 
Defaults and clauses are part of an Shareful API [[SAPI]] for
 
Defaults and clauses are part of an Shareful API [[SAPI]] for
 
#machines automating inviting
 
#machines automating inviting
#build varied applications
+
#build varied applications with the same logic
#federating applications easy
+
#easy federating applications contents
  
  
Line 122: Line 117:
  
 
===Shareful.be===
 
===Shareful.be===
[[Shareful.be]] is lovely by being
+
[[Shareful.be]] is one of the posible shareful platforms, it is lovely by being
#very free easy to copy [[shareful backup]], [[shareful mirror]], translate, improve, redistribute, etc.
+
#very free easy to copy (i.e. [[shareful backup]], [[shareful mirror]], translate, improve, redistribute, etc.)
#lovely referral for lighting the communication of the invitation, the more shareful crowded place in the world)  
+
#lovely referral (i.e. the more shareful crowded place in the world, for lighting the communication of the invitation, etc.)  
#offering more help [[:Category:Shareful cases|cases]] nonbonding for contextual and subjective mediating with the offers.
+
#offering additional help (i.e. documenting non-binding [[:Category:Shareful cases|cases]] for contextual and subjective mediating with the offers)
  
  
Line 141: Line 136:
  
 
==Shareful morphosintaxis==
 
==Shareful morphosintaxis==
Shareful is a defaultly a noun shareful (for adding adjectives clauses), also useful as a verb (for regular activity) and as an adjective (for coding types of shareful objects and sharics).  
+
Shareful is a defaultly a noun (for adding adjectives representing clauses), it is also useful as a verb (for regular activity) and an adjective (for types of shareful objects).  
  
  
  
 
===Shareful and native english speakers===
 
===Shareful and native english speakers===
Shareful is ever barely used by english native speakers, unless it is a quite logical and lovely construction (usable, useful, shareable, ...). Everybody else (the majority of the people) with a little knowledge of the english language quickly understand the brighter point of it (specially when comparing it with “sharing”). 
 
 
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
 
''-Shareful is a word that don't exist in english, regardless of shareable, useable and useful''.
 
''-Shareful is a word that don't exist in english, regardless of shareable, useable and useful''.
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
he important point is translating accurately the [[shareful default]] and its [[shareful clauses|clauses]].
+
Shareful is ever barely used by english native speakers, unless it is a quite logical and lovely construction (usable, useful, shareable, ...). Everybody else (the majority of the people) with a little knowledge of the english language quickly understand the brighter point of it (specially when comparing it with "sharing").
<noinclude>
+
 
[[Category:Templates/Shareful specs]]
 
</noinclude>
 
  
  
  
 
===Shareful translations===
 
===Shareful translations===
Shareful translations should be adapted to the local way of coding the act of lovely sharing. I.e. "[[compartiva]]" is one way to translate shareful into spanish, portuguese, italian, catalan and galego. Any spanish can either invite to it as if it is "compartiva" or it is "shareful". Both should work the same way, it is up to the invitor. It is important translating accurately the [[shareful default]] and the [[shareful clauses|clauses]], any specific word for a local shareful version whether existing and being related or created completely new can be created.
+
Shareful translations should be adapted to the local way of coding the act of lovely sharing. I.e. "[[compartiva]]" is one way to translate shareful into spanish, portuguese, italian, catalan and galego. Any spanish can either invite to it as if it is "compartiva" or it is "shareful". Both should work the same way, it is up to the invitor.  
 +
 
 +
The more important bit for translating accurately are the [[shareful default]] and the [[shareful clauses|clauses]]. The word for representing that, whether existing and being related or created completely new, it is a less important case.
  
  
  
 
====Copying shareful====
 
====Copying shareful====
Shareful is copied with any other words that bringing any benefit to it. They only need the reference of ''as in shareful'' in their copied invitation if that wanted, i.e. xrfl, shary, churfle
+
Shareful is copied with any other words bringing any benefit to it. They only need the reference of ''as in shareful'' in their copied invitation if that is explicitly wanted, i.e. xrfl, shary, churfle
  
  
Line 177: Line 170:
 
#better as a noun (i.e. instead of ''shamefulness'', does need the ''invitation'' companion less).
 
#better as a noun (i.e. instead of ''shamefulness'', does need the ''invitation'' companion less).
  
But churfle it is a worse because code
+
But churfle it is a worse default code than shareful because
 
#requires time for getting its meaning
 
#requires time for getting its meaning
 
#requires a high phonetic art
 
#requires a high phonetic art
Line 187: Line 180:
  
 
==Shareful and law==
 
==Shareful and law==
"Invitation" is the terms (core + clauses + other specifications). "Offer" is [[object]] + terms. BTW> "Invitation" generally means "invitation to an offer" in [[law]].
+
"Invitation" is the terms (core + clauses + other specifications). "Offer" is [[object]] + terms. By the way: "Invitation" generally means "invitation to an offer" in [[law]].
  
  
Line 195: Line 188:
  
 
===Shareful is safer than sharing in conventional law===
 
===Shareful is safer than sharing in conventional law===
Conventional law specify sharing only as coownership, and not as an specific joint or borrowed use. In conventional law, anyone should only appeal to consuetudinary rights for starting a claim. Costitudinary rights settling depends more on the subjective interpretation of the judge and that makes it being a less quality code i.e.
+
Conventional law specify sharing mainly as co-ownership, and not much as a specific joint or for free borrowed use. In conventional law, anyone should only appeal to consuetudinary rights for starting a claim over a sharing breach of terms. Costitudinary rights settling depends more on the subjective interpretation of the judge and that makes it being a less quality code i.e.
  
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
Line 203: Line 196:
 
That judge could later interpret your sharing offer verbal phrase as if you had gifted that to that someone and closing your claim or could interpret liability in a breach of contract from that someone to you and punish him accordingly. In this sense, the SI (i.e. you have said instead: ''-I can shareful this with you'' or simply shareful) is helping you a little bit more with such authority in such that case.  
 
That judge could later interpret your sharing offer verbal phrase as if you had gifted that to that someone and closing your claim or could interpret liability in a breach of contract from that someone to you and punish him accordingly. In this sense, the SI (i.e. you have said instead: ''-I can shareful this with you'' or simply shareful) is helping you a little bit more with such authority in such that case.  
  
If the conventional authority considers that you have ''mislaid'' a thing by offering it shareful (you are being a society damager for dumping carelessly something in the public arena), tell us or tell them that they should go and sue the writer of the lines of the shareful default invitation with a heavier charge due to the additional damage that is inviting freed i.e. The object (cultural work) the [[Shareful Invitation]] default is, if required, it is offered [[freed]].
+
 
 +
 
 +
If the conventional authority considers that you have ''mislaid'' a thing by offering it shareful (you are being a society damager for dumping carelessly something in the public arena), tell us or directly tell them that they should go and sue the the shareful default invitation writer with a heavier charge becuase there is more of the same damage in inviting "freed".  
  
  
Line 211: Line 206:
  
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
We want shareful to be pleasantly shared and ease the using of sensible smiles for inviting and for the acceptance of terms for sharing this shareful love, then we can be independent from the word shareful. We don't pretend to “hack the law”, we neither want to "crack the law", we “art code".  
+
We want shareful terms to be shared with please between people. We pretend the using of sensible smiles for inviting and for the acceptance of terms too, for being independent from the word "shareful". We don't pretend to "hack the law", we neither want to "crack the law", we simply "art code".  
 
   
 
   
Conventional law is highly artificial and poor quality sophisticated code for creating an environment where people is being dependent on elite lawyers.
+
Conventional law is highly artificial and its sophistication has a poor quality code. It creates an environment where people is being dependent on elite lawyers and unreachable estrructures than could change the terms normally favouring the most privileged subjects.
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
There is also the Lawful SI project of making a copy of the SI based on lawyers language (Lawful SI project) which will never be a parent of the default SI nor impede any of the rights offered with the default SI.
+
There is also the [[Full Lawful Shareful Invitation project]] for making a copy of the SI based on lawyers language which will never be a parent of the default SI nor impede any of the rights offered with the default SI.
  
  
  
 
===Damages dissuasion===
 
===Damages dissuasion===
Damages are discouraged with the settling defaults and clauses (and clauses in general i.e. requiring a grant).  
+
Damages are discouraged with the settling defaults and with clauses i.e. requiring a grant.
 +
 
 +
Everyone could use useful external tools i.e. [[trustful code]] with not yet very known people or get support help in the global or in the more local communities arising around any successful shareful application.  
  
Everyone could use useful external tools i.e. [[trustful code]] with not yet very known people or get support help in the global or in the more local scope in communities arising around and because of any successful shareful application. The more that shareful offering grows around, the more damages dissuasion because less of those things you could get to use if you deliberately do a damage or don't compensate an accidental damage.
+
The more that shareful offering grows around, the more damages dissuasion there will be because less of those things you could get to use if you deliberately do a damage or don't compensate an accidental damage, because every offeror is free to interpret such behaviour as "not caring" and imped you using according to that.  
  
  

Revision as of 18:54, 9 April 2014

Shareful is lovely share coming from partake, going to share void, child of freed and parent of swap


Life floves:

  1. ...
    1. flove
      1. gaia
        1. human
          1. love
          2. will
          3. wise
        2. rate
          1. be
          2. trustful
          3. free
        3. make
          1. freed
          2. shareful
          3. swap



Shareful is

  1. what people feel and view about it
  2. lovely sharing
  3. inviting to share



Shareful inviting

Adding invitation to shareful Shareful invitation is for more explicitly offering whatever object with very permissive terms. Invitation is a lovely offering of objects


Shareful Invitation (default)

Object for sharing

useful anytime for everyone caring

cheers


Template:SI

This default invitation being so short and love loaded is useful for

  1. better sharing the flow with people when coding their relations
  2. being understood and debated with the minimal posible learning curve by anyone barely knowing any english.
  3. making settling interaction pleasant enough (i.e. "anytime" not being easily gamed to "not now")



Defaults, clauses and wills

There are varied and limited copies of the SI (i.e. shareful, just shareful, use with care, Full Shareful Invitation project, etc). Some of these shareful inviting defaults are available in shareful applications where if you choose to custom a personal default shareful inviting by overwriting the SI, then your invinting might be labelled as "for sharing".


Shareful clause is information added to a shareful Invitation that conditionates the shareful love in some way.

Shareful clause could also be the shareful conditioning of an outcome in another kiind of dealing i.e. HootSha$.

There is a set of limitations that can be choosed and anyone can also add their own custom limitations in the applications.

Shareful clauses are harming the shareful love but might make more comfortable most of the people in many contextual situations. Some shareful acts will start heavily claused and after gaining more confidence, they will be dropping some or all clauses later for that or for another thing.

Some shareful offer could be more sharic having 7 clauses than another having just a far one


An additional shareful invitation specification is information that doesn't conditionate meaningfully the shareful love i.e.

  1. Wills, wishes, projections attached (useful for networking offeror with more related receiven)
  2. Future happenings that could condition it (i.e. )
  3. Ease and safety instructions



Settling clauses

Settling clauses are parameters ordering for settling disputes. There is a limited set of 5 ascending descending phrases in the default application.

The settling clauses are useful for

  1. any mediator who is not the original offeror should settle disputes, if any.
  2. not needing to bother about adding other type of clauses at al
  3. generating quality relational information between offerors.


The default settling is

  1. "caring cheers" in the invitation
  2. "tell contact and bring it back" in the web form
  3. "as found or improved" in the support text


The extended default clausing for settling is

  1. "the one who more future lovely offers".
  2. "..., less things have at the present",
  3. "the one having been less user of the more similar things in the past",





Shareful clauses coding

Clauses are free cored with words, numbers, graphics, signs, audio and else formats.

Words identfiers for clauses are all with "-y" (except the adjectives -ness suffix for clauses for settling disputes) because

  1. cutes any formal word (specially nouns and verbs)
  2. flows like shareful in a the morphological side
  3. Adjective (shareful is primarily a noun)
  4. Recognizable (related to the popular view on that restriction)
  5. Original (for not conflicting with other keywords that we could better use for other specifications i.e. bringa shareful would confuse)
  6. Restrictive connotation (because a clause is restrictive)
  7. A little bit insulting (for promoting a discouraging influence for restricting and for encouraging selfcriticism when doing so).
  8. Unique (for robustness)






Shareful application

Defaults and clauses are part of an Shareful API SAPI for

  1. machines automating inviting
  2. build varied applications with the same logic
  3. easy federating applications contents



Shareful.be

Shareful.be is one of the posible shareful platforms, it is lovely by being

  1. very free easy to copy (i.e. shareful backup, shareful mirror, translate, improve, redistribute, etc.)
  2. lovely referral (i.e. the more shareful crowded place in the world, for lighting the communication of the invitation, etc.)
  3. offering additional help (i.e. documenting non-binding cases for contextual and subjective mediating with the offers)


be.shareful.be form is made with

  1. the less code possible
  2. the more expressive featuring
  3. more varied forms





Shareful morphosintaxis

Shareful is a defaultly a noun (for adding adjectives representing clauses), it is also useful as a verb (for regular activity) and an adjective (for types of shareful objects).


Shareful and native english speakers

-Shareful is a word that don't exist in english, regardless of shareable, useable and useful.

Shareful is ever barely used by english native speakers, unless it is a quite logical and lovely construction (usable, useful, shareable, ...). Everybody else (the majority of the people) with a little knowledge of the english language quickly understand the brighter point of it (specially when comparing it with "sharing").



Shareful translations

Shareful translations should be adapted to the local way of coding the act of lovely sharing. I.e. "compartiva" is one way to translate shareful into spanish, portuguese, italian, catalan and galego. Any spanish can either invite to it as if it is "compartiva" or it is "shareful". Both should work the same way, it is up to the invitor.

The more important bit for translating accurately are the shareful default and the clauses. The word for representing that, whether existing and being related or created completely new, it is a less important case.


Copying shareful

Shareful is copied with any other words bringing any benefit to it. They only need the reference of as in shareful in their copied invitation if that is explicitly wanted, i.e. xrfl, shary, churfle


Churfle

churfle is the universalization of productive, careful and happy use, as in shareful.



Shareful Invitation (default)

Object for sharing

useful anytime for everyone caring

cheers


Churfle or sharfle is lovelier than shareful because

  1. much lovelier phonetics (phonetics being the link to its etimology)
  2. Better as a verb (to churfle vs to shareful, churfling vs sharefulling)
  3. better as a noun (i.e. instead of shamefulness, does need the invitation companion less).

But churfle it is a worse default code than shareful because

  1. requires time for getting its meaning
  2. requires a high phonetic art
  3. it does not increase trust generally



Shareful and law

"Invitation" is the terms (core + clauses + other specifications). "Offer" is object + terms. By the way: "Invitation" generally means "invitation to an offer" in law.


Shareful default invitation offerorship

The object (cultural work) the Shareful Invitation default is, if required, it is offered freed.


Shareful is safer than sharing in conventional law

Conventional law specify sharing mainly as co-ownership, and not much as a specific joint or for free borrowed use. In conventional law, anyone should only appeal to consuetudinary rights for starting a claim over a sharing breach of terms. Costitudinary rights settling depends more on the subjective interpretation of the judge and that makes it being a less quality code i.e.

-Dear judge or else conventional authority, i only told him i could share the lighter with him and he did not bring it back to me, he stole it.

That judge could later interpret your sharing offer verbal phrase as if you had gifted that to that someone and closing your claim or could interpret liability in a breach of contract from that someone to you and punish him accordingly. In this sense, the SI (i.e. you have said instead: -I can shareful this with you or simply shareful) is helping you a little bit more with such authority in such that case.


If the conventional authority considers that you have mislaid a thing by offering it shareful (you are being a society damager for dumping carelessly something in the public arena), tell us or directly tell them that they should go and sue the the shareful default invitation writer with a heavier charge becuase there is more of the same damage in inviting "freed".


Shareful core is lovelier than law

Shareful core a more lovely vibration than law codes for sharing i.e.

We want shareful terms to be shared with please between people. We pretend the using of sensible smiles for inviting and for the acceptance of terms too, for being independent from the word "shareful". We don't pretend to "hack the law", we neither want to "crack the law", we simply "art code".

Conventional law is highly artificial and its sophistication has a poor quality code. It creates an environment where people is being dependent on elite lawyers and unreachable estrructures than could change the terms normally favouring the most privileged subjects.

There is also the Full Lawful Shareful Invitation project for making a copy of the SI based on lawyers language which will never be a parent of the default SI nor impede any of the rights offered with the default SI.


Damages dissuasion

Damages are discouraged with the settling defaults and with clauses i.e. requiring a grant.

Everyone could use useful external tools i.e. trustful code with not yet very known people or get support help in the global or in the more local communities arising around any successful shareful application.

The more that shareful offering grows around, the more damages dissuasion there will be because less of those things you could get to use if you deliberately do a damage or don't compensate an accidental damage, because every offeror is free to interpret such behaviour as "not caring" and imped you using according to that.




Sharic

Action sharic:

[[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]]
offer1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
pack2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
project3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
[[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]]


Sharic legend

Template:Sharic legend



See also


Mindmaps

  • Love and limits: shareful implicit love and clauses ("limits")
  • Love and limits sources, the more extended mindmap version maybe. It focuses in simetric relationing between types of clauses ("limits" on the right side) with its implicit opposite positive ones ("love" in the left).