Difference between revisions of "Shareful"

From Wowwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
 +
 
{{Shareful}}
 
{{Shareful}}
  
Line 6: Line 8:
 
{{TOC Right}}
 
{{TOC Right}}
  
==Shareful is==
 
#what people feel and view about it
 
#lovely sharing
 
#inviting to share
 
  
  
 +
==Shareful love==
 +
Shareful loves:
 +
#objects being used and cared
 +
#allow and expose use restrictions
 +
#not perturbing future relation
  
  
==Shareful [[inviting]]==
 
Adding invitation to shareful [[Shareful invitation]] is for more explicitly offering whatever object with very permissive terms.
 
{{Invitation}}
 
  
{{Shareful Invitation}}
+
==Shareful will==
 +
Shareful plays with:
 +
#objects being more active
 +
#scalable permissions and non-binding wishes attached
 +
#enriching people avoiding price
  
{{SI}}
 
  
This default invitation being so short and love loaded is useful for
 
#better sharing the flow with people when coding their relations
 
#being understood and debated with the minimal posible learning curve by anyone barely knowing any english.
 
#making settling interaction pleasant enough (i.e. "anytime" not being easily gamed to "not now")
 
  
 +
==Shareful wow==
 +
Shareful wows:
 +
#what people feel and view with the "lovely sharing" default code
 +
#inviting to share with [[shareful invitation default]]s
 +
#providing a sharing grammar ([[SAPI]]) with custom clauses scripting bundles for priceless borrowing
  
  
  
===Defaults, clauses and wills===
 
There are varied and limited copies of the SI (i.e. shareful, just shareful, use with care, [[Full Shareful Invitation]] project, etc). Some of these shareful inviting defaults are available in shareful applications where if you choose to custom a personal default shareful inviting by overwriting the SI, then your invinting might be labelled as "for sharing".
 
  
  
 +
===Shareful [[inviting]]===
 +
{{Invitation}}
  
{{Shareful clause definition}}
+
{{Shareful Invitation}}
There is a set of limitations that can be choosed and anyone can also add their own custom limitations in the applications.
+
  
Shareful clauses are harming the [[shareful love]] but might make more comfortable most of the people in many contextual situations. Some shareful acts will start heavily claused and after gaining more confidence, they will be dropping some or all clauses later for that or for another thing.
+
{{SI}}
  
<blockquote>
+
This default invitation is letting being, trust and relating flowing because:
Some shareful offer could be more [[sharic]] having 7 clauses than another having just a ''[[far]]'' one
+
#is short and lovely loaded
</blockquote>
+
#can be understood and debated easily by anyone barely knowing any english
 +
#makes hipothetic settling interaction pleasant enough
  
  
  
{{Additional shareful invitation specification}}i.e.
 
#Wills, wishes, projections attached (useful for networking offeror with more related receiven)
 
#Future happenings that could condition it (i.e. )
 
#Ease and safety instructions
 
  
 +
===Defaults, clauses and wills===
 +
There are varied and limited copies of the [[SI]] (i.e. shareful, just shareful, use with care, [[Full Shareful Invitation]] project, etc).
  
 +
Here in this wiki you'll find a set of limitations ([[shareful clauses]] --> [[SAPI]]), but anyone can add their own custom clauses in whichever application. Some platform could not feed or blacklist another so-called shareful platform, or at some platforms your inviting might be labelled as "for sharing" only (not shareful) if you choose to make a custom [[shareful core]] (customize a default shareful inviting by overwriting any of the default SIs offered there).
  
 +
{{Shareful clause definition}}
  
 +
Shareful clauses are harming the [[shareful love]] but might make more comfortable most of the people in many contextual situations. Some shareful acts will start heavily claused and after gaining more trust, they will be dropping some or all clauses later for that or for another thing.
  
====Settling clauses====
+
<blockquote>
Settling clauses are parameters ordering for settling disputes. There is a limited set of 5 ascending descending phrases in the default application.
+
Some shareful offer could be more [[sharic]] having 7 clauses than another having just a ''[[far]]'' lovely one
 +
</blockquote>
  
The settling clauses are useful for
 
#any mediator who is not the original offeror should settle disputes, if any. 
 
#not needing to bother about adding other type of clauses at al
 
#generating quality relational information between offerors.
 
  
 +
{{shareful mindmaps}}
  
  
The default settling is
 
#"caring cheers" in the invitation
 
#"tell contact and bring it back" in the web form
 
#"as found or improved" in the support text
 
  
  
The extended default clausing for settling is
 
#"the one who more future lovely offers".
 
#"..., less things have at the present",
 
#"the one having been less user of the more similar things in the past",
 
  
  
 +
====Shareful clauses coding====
 +
Shareful clauses are coded with the -y suffix added to an adjective (shareful is primarily a noun) that is:
 +
#'''Unique''' (is not a formal word)
 +
#'''Recognizable''' (related to the popular view on that restriction)
 +
#'''Insultive connotation'''(for promoting a discouraging influence for restricting and for encouraging selfcriticism when doing so).
  
 +
Clauses can also be expressed with graphics, signs, audio and else formats (in the way).
  
  
  
  
 +
=====Additional information=====
 +
Furthermore than normative narrative, additional shareful invitation specifications can be added to a SI.
  
 +
{{Additional shareful invitation specification}}i.e.
 +
#Wills, wishes, projections attached (useful for networking offeror with more related receiven)
 +
#Future happenings that could surely condition it (i.e. [[shareful conditionals]])
 +
#Use ease and safety instructions
  
====Shareful clauses coding====
 
Clauses are free cored with words, numbers, graphics, signs, audio and else formats.
 
  
Words identfiers for clauses are all with "-y"  (except the adjectives -ness suffix for clauses for settling disputes) because
 
#cutes any formal word (specially nouns and verbs)
 
#flows like shareful in a the morphological side
 
#'''Adjective''' (shareful is primarily a noun)
 
#'''Recognizable''' (related to the popular view on that restriction)
 
#'''Original''' (for not conflicting with other keywords that we could better use for other specifications i.e. bringa shareful would confuse)
 
#'''Restrictive connotation''' (because a clause is restrictive)
 
#'''A little bit insulting''' (for promoting a discouraging influence for restricting and for encouraging selfcriticism when doing so).
 
#'''Unique''' (for robustness)
 
  
  
  
 +
====[[Settling clauses]]====
 +
The settling clauses are useful for
 +
#settling mediation 
 +
#not needing adding other type of use restricting clauses
 +
#generating quality relational information between offerors
  
  
  
 +
The default settling is
 +
#"caring cheers" in the invitation
 +
#"tell contact and bring it back" in the web form
 +
#"as found or improved" in the support text
  
  
 +
The extended default clausing for settling is
 +
#"the one who more lovely offers in the future".
 +
#"..., less things have at the present",
 +
#"the one having been less user of the more similar things in the past",
  
  
==Shareful application==
 
Defaults and clauses are part of an Shareful API [[SAPI]] for
 
#machines automating inviting
 
#build varied applications with the same logic
 
#easy federating applications contents
 
  
  
Line 117: Line 121:
  
 
===Shareful.be===
 
===Shareful.be===
[[Shareful.be]] is one of the posible shareful platforms, it is lovely by being
+
[[Shareful.be]] is one of the posible shareful platforms, it is very free because:
 
#very free easy to copy (i.e. [[shareful backup]], [[shareful mirror]], translate, improve, redistribute, etc.)
 
#very free easy to copy (i.e. [[shareful backup]], [[shareful mirror]], translate, improve, redistribute, etc.)
 
#lovely referral (i.e. the more shareful crowded place in the world, for lighting the communication of the invitation, etc.)  
 
#lovely referral (i.e. the more shareful crowded place in the world, for lighting the communication of the invitation, etc.)  
#offering additional help (i.e. documenting non-binding [[:Category:Shareful cases|cases]] for contextual and subjective mediating with the offers)
+
#offering additional help (i.e. documenting non-binding [[:Category:Shareful cases|cases]] for contextual and subjective mediating with the offers, etc)
  
  
be.shareful.be form is made with  
+
[[be.shareful.be]] form is made with  
 
#the less code possible
 
#the less code possible
#the more expressive featuring  
+
#the more expressive featuring
 
#more varied forms
 
#more varied forms
  
Line 136: Line 140:
  
 
==Shareful morphosintaxis==
 
==Shareful morphosintaxis==
Shareful is a defaultly a noun (for adding adjectives representing clauses), it is also useful as a verb (for regular activity) and an adjective (for types of shareful objects).  
+
Shareful, morphositactickly speaking, is:
 +
#defaultly a noun (for adding adjectives representing clauses i.e. [[Timy shareful]])
 +
#useful as a verb (i want to shareful my time)
 +
#an adjective (i.e. Shareful time)
  
  
Line 145: Line 152:
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
Shareful is ever barely used by english native speakers, unless it is a quite logical and lovely construction (usable, useful, shareable, ...). Everybody else (the majority of the people) with a little knowledge of the english language quickly understand the brighter point of it (specially when comparing it with "sharing").   
+
Shareful is ever barely used by english native speakers, unless it is a quite logical and lovely construction (usable --> useful, shareable --> ...). Majority of people with a little knowledge of the english language sometimes get to feel shareful before than a native english speaker.   
  
  
Line 151: Line 158:
  
 
===Shareful translations===
 
===Shareful translations===
Shareful translations should be adapted to the local way of coding the act of lovely sharing. I.e. "[[compartiva]]" is one way to translate shareful into spanish, portuguese, italian, catalan and galego. Any spanish can either invite to it as if it is "compartiva" or it is "shareful". Both should work the same way, it is up to the invitor.
+
Shareful translations should be adapted to the local way of coding the act of lovely sharing. I.e. "[[compartiva]]" is one way to translate shareful into spanish, portuguese, italian, catalan and galego. Any spanish speker can either invite to it as if it is "compartiva" or it is "shareful". Both should work the same way, it is up to the invitor.  
 
+
The more important bit for translating accurately are the [[shareful default]] and the [[shareful clauses|clauses]]. The word for representing that, whether existing and being related or created completely new, it is a less important case.
+
  
  
  
 
====Copying shareful====
 
====Copying shareful====
Shareful is copied with any other words bringing any benefit to it. They only need the reference of ''as in shareful'' in their copied invitation if that is explicitly wanted, i.e. xrfl, shary, churfle
+
Shareful is copied with any other words bringing any benefit to it. They only need the reference of ''as in shareful'' in their copied invitation if that is explicitly wanted, i.e. xrfl, shary, churfle, etc
  
  
Line 170: Line 175:
 
#better as a noun (i.e. instead of ''shamefulness'', does need the ''invitation'' companion less).
 
#better as a noun (i.e. instead of ''shamefulness'', does need the ''invitation'' companion less).
  
But churfle it is a worse default code than shareful because
+
But churfle it has a lesser wow than shareful because
#requires time for getting its meaning
+
#requires time for getting its meaning  
#requires a high phonetic art
+
#requires a high phonetic art  
#it does not increase trust generally
+
#it does increase joy of some experts, but is less trustful for newsharers overall
 
+
  
  
Line 180: Line 184:
  
 
==Shareful and law==
 
==Shareful and law==
"Invitation" is the terms (core + clauses + other specifications). "Offer" is [[object]] + terms. By the way: "Invitation" generally means "invitation to an offer" in [[law]].
+
*"Invitation" refers to the terms (core + clauses + other specifications).  
 +
*"Offer" is the [[object]] + terms.  
 +
 
 +
:By the way: "Invitation" generally means "invitation to an offer" in [[law]].
  
  
 
===Shareful default invitation offerorship===
 
===Shareful default invitation offerorship===
The object (cultural work) the [[Shareful Invitation]] default is, if required, it is offered [[freed]].
+
The object (cultural work) the [[Shareful Invitation]] default is, if required, it is offered [[freed]], as any other wow.wiki.yt contents are.
  
  
 
===Shareful is safer than sharing in conventional law===
 
===Shareful is safer than sharing in conventional law===
Conventional law specify sharing mainly as co-ownership, and not much as a specific joint or for free borrowed use. In conventional law, anyone should only appeal to consuetudinary rights for starting a claim over a sharing breach of terms. Costitudinary rights settling depends more on the subjective interpretation of the judge and that makes it being a less quality code i.e.
+
In any posible shareful conventional plaintiff, if the conventional authority would consider that:
 +
#You have ''mislaid'' a thing by offering it shareful (you are being a society damager for dumping carelessly something in the public space). ''Tell us or directly tell them that they should go and sue the shareful default invitation writer and rest of other users''
 +
#You have gifted it. ''You can argue that is easier to say "for you" than "shareful", which even being a neologism, the epistemologic path to get to sharing is the more reasonable and traceable construction''
 +
#You have given a co-ownership of it. ''That can happen, as shareful is based in sharing, i.e.''
  
 +
 +
Conventional law has sharing mainly specified as co-ownership, and less for when is sharing is a joint (concurrently or not) or for free borrowed use (most of the sharing cases in life and what shareful is for) and could cause the following trouble:
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
''-Dear judge or else conventional authority, i only told him i could share the lighter with him and he did not bring it back to me, he stole it''.  
+
''-Dear judge or else conventional authority, i saw him he was asking for light to people and i only gave him the following [[invitation to treat]]: "i can share the lighter with you" and he did not bring it back to me a minute later when i asked him for giving it back to me. He asked for my contact and stole it from me for a week!''.  
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
That judge could later interpret your sharing offer verbal phrase as if you had gifted that to that someone and closing your claim or could interpret liability in a breach of contract from that someone to you and punish him accordingly. In this sense, the SI (i.e. you have said instead: ''-I can shareful this with you'' or simply shareful) is helping you a little bit more with such authority in such that case.  
+
That judge could later interpret your sharing offer verbal phrase as if you had gifted part of co-ownership to that someone and closing your claim (instead of the liability in a breach of borrowing contract from that someone to you that you are looking for).
 
+
  
 +
Rather having said: "shareful" (lighter), is supposed to have helped you a little bit more with conventional law authorities. Shareful clauses should be enforceable through the conventional law private contracting field but there have not been sharefulness with conventional law test cases (yet?).
  
If the conventional authority considers that you have ''mislaid'' a thing by offering it shareful (you are being a society damager for dumping carelessly something in the public arena), tell us or directly tell them that they should go and sue the the shareful default invitation writer with a heavier charge becuase there is more of the same damage in inviting "freed".
 
  
  
  
==Shareful core is lovelier than law==
+
==Shareful wow is lovelier than law==
Shareful core a more lovely vibration than law codes for sharing i.e.  
+
Shareful wow has a more lovely vibration than law codes for sharing i.e.  
  
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
We want shareful terms to be shared with please between people. We pretend the using of sensible smiles for inviting and for the acceptance of terms too, for being independent from the word "shareful". We don't pretend to "hack the law", we neither want to "crack the law", we simply "art code".
+
We want shareful terms to be shared with please between people. We pretend the using of sensible smiles for inviting and for the acceptance of terms too, for being independent from the word "shareful". We don't pretend to "hack the law", we neither want to "crack the law", we "art the code".  
+
Conventional law is highly artificial and its sophistication has a poor quality code. It creates an environment where people is being dependent on elite lawyers and unreachable estrructures than could change the terms normally favouring the most privileged subjects.
+
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
There is also the [[Full Lawful Shareful Invitation project]] for making a copy of the SI based on lawyers language which will never be a parent of the default SI nor impede any of the rights offered with the default SI.
+
Conventional law is highly artificial and its sophistication has a poor quality code. It creates an environment where people is being dependent on elitist lawyers and unreachable power structures for the most of us. Finally, there is also the [[Full Lawful Shareful Invitation project]] for making a copy of the SI based on lawyers language which will never be a parent of the default SI nor impede any of the rights offered with the default SI.
  
  
  
 
===Damages dissuasion===
 
===Damages dissuasion===
Damages are discouraged with the settling defaults and with clauses i.e. requiring a grant.
+
Damages are discouraged with the settling defaults and with clauses i.e. requiring a grant, or using useful external tools i.e. [[trustful code]].  
 
+
Everyone could use useful external tools i.e. [[trustful code]] with not yet very known people or get support help in the global or in the more local communities arising around any successful shareful application.
+
 
+
The more that shareful offering grows around, the more damages dissuasion there will be because less of those things you could get to use if you deliberately do a damage or don't compensate an accidental damage, because every offeror is free to interpret such behaviour as "not caring" and imped you using according to that.  
+
  
 +
The more that shareful offering grows around, the more a damage causes bad reputation. Every offeror is free to interpret such behaviour as "not caring" and imped you using according to that, you could try to difamate him but you are ''less''. 
  
  
Line 234: Line 240:
 
==Sharic legend==
 
==Sharic legend==
 
{{Sharic legend}}
 
{{Sharic legend}}
 +
 +
 +
  
  
Line 244: Line 253:
  
  
 
===Mindmaps===
 
* [http://app.wisemapping.com/c/maps/84819/public Love and limits]: shareful implicit love and clauses ("limits") 
 
* [https://app.wisemapping.com/c/maps/172459/public Love and limits sources], the more extended mindmap version ''maybe''. It focuses in simetric relationing between types of clauses ("limits" on the right side) with its implicit opposite positive ones ("love" in the left).
 
  
  
 
[[Category:Shareful]]
 
[[Category:Shareful]]

Revision as of 23:39, 11 November 2014


Shareful is lovely share coming from partake, going to share void, child of freed and parent of swap


Life floves:

  1. ...
    1. flove
      1. gaia
        1. human
          1. love
          2. will
          3. wise
        2. rate
          1. be
          2. trustful
          3. free
        3. make
          1. freed
          2. shareful
          3. swap




Shareful love

Shareful loves:

  1. objects being used and cared
  2. allow and expose use restrictions
  3. not perturbing future relation


Shareful will

Shareful plays with:

  1. objects being more active
  2. scalable permissions and non-binding wishes attached
  3. enriching people avoiding price


Shareful wow

Shareful wows:

  1. what people feel and view with the "lovely sharing" default code
  2. inviting to share with shareful invitation defaults
  3. providing a sharing grammar (SAPI) with custom clauses scripting bundles for priceless borrowing



Shareful inviting

Invitation is a lovely offering of objects


Shareful Invitation (default)

Object for sharing

useful anytime for everyone caring

cheers


Template:SI

This default invitation is letting being, trust and relating flowing because:

  1. is short and lovely loaded
  2. can be understood and debated easily by anyone barely knowing any english
  3. makes hipothetic settling interaction pleasant enough



Defaults, clauses and wills

There are varied and limited copies of the SI (i.e. shareful, just shareful, use with care, Full Shareful Invitation project, etc).

Here in this wiki you'll find a set of limitations (shareful clauses --> SAPI), but anyone can add their own custom clauses in whichever application. Some platform could not feed or blacklist another so-called shareful platform, or at some platforms your inviting might be labelled as "for sharing" only (not shareful) if you choose to make a custom shareful core (customize a default shareful inviting by overwriting any of the default SIs offered there).

Shareful clause is information added to a shareful Invitation that conditionates the shareful love in some way.

Shareful clause could also be the shareful conditioning of an outcome in another kiind of dealing i.e. HootSha$.


Shareful clauses are harming the shareful love but might make more comfortable most of the people in many contextual situations. Some shareful acts will start heavily claused and after gaining more trust, they will be dropping some or all clauses later for that or for another thing.

Some shareful offer could be more sharic having 7 clauses than another having just a far lovely one


It focuses in simetric relationing between types of clauses ("limits" on the right side) with its implicit opposite positive ones ("shareful default love" in the left) if the clause is not selected.




Shareful clauses coding

Shareful clauses are coded with the -y suffix added to an adjective (shareful is primarily a noun) that is:

  1. Unique (is not a formal word)
  2. Recognizable (related to the popular view on that restriction)
  3. Insultive connotation(for promoting a discouraging influence for restricting and for encouraging selfcriticism when doing so).

Clauses can also be expressed with graphics, signs, audio and else formats (in the way).



Additional information

Furthermore than normative narrative, additional shareful invitation specifications can be added to a SI.

An additional shareful invitation specification is information that doesn't conditionate meaningfully the shareful love i.e.

  1. Wills, wishes, projections attached (useful for networking offeror with more related receiven)
  2. Future happenings that could surely condition it (i.e. shareful conditionals)
  3. Use ease and safety instructions



Settling clauses

The settling clauses are useful for

  1. settling mediation
  2. not needing adding other type of use restricting clauses
  3. generating quality relational information between offerors


The default settling is

  1. "caring cheers" in the invitation
  2. "tell contact and bring it back" in the web form
  3. "as found or improved" in the support text


The extended default clausing for settling is

  1. "the one who more lovely offers in the future".
  2. "..., less things have at the present",
  3. "the one having been less user of the more similar things in the past",




Shareful.be

Shareful.be is one of the posible shareful platforms, it is very free because:

  1. very free easy to copy (i.e. shareful backup, shareful mirror, translate, improve, redistribute, etc.)
  2. lovely referral (i.e. the more shareful crowded place in the world, for lighting the communication of the invitation, etc.)
  3. offering additional help (i.e. documenting non-binding cases for contextual and subjective mediating with the offers, etc)


be.shareful.be form is made with

  1. the less code possible
  2. the more expressive featuring
  3. more varied forms





Shareful morphosintaxis

Shareful, morphositactickly speaking, is:

  1. defaultly a noun (for adding adjectives representing clauses i.e. Timy shareful)
  2. useful as a verb (i want to shareful my time)
  3. an adjective (i.e. Shareful time)


Shareful and native english speakers

-Shareful is a word that don't exist in english, regardless of shareable, useable and useful.

Shareful is ever barely used by english native speakers, unless it is a quite logical and lovely construction (usable --> useful, shareable --> ...). Majority of people with a little knowledge of the english language sometimes get to feel shareful before than a native english speaker.



Shareful translations

Shareful translations should be adapted to the local way of coding the act of lovely sharing. I.e. "compartiva" is one way to translate shareful into spanish, portuguese, italian, catalan and galego. Any spanish speker can either invite to it as if it is "compartiva" or it is "shareful". Both should work the same way, it is up to the invitor.


Copying shareful

Shareful is copied with any other words bringing any benefit to it. They only need the reference of as in shareful in their copied invitation if that is explicitly wanted, i.e. xrfl, shary, churfle, etc


Churfle

churfle is the universalization of productive, careful and happy use, as in shareful.



Shareful Invitation (default)

Object for sharing

useful anytime for everyone caring

cheers


Churfle or sharfle is lovelier than shareful because

  1. much lovelier phonetics (phonetics being the link to its etimology)
  2. Better as a verb (to churfle vs to shareful, churfling vs sharefulling)
  3. better as a noun (i.e. instead of shamefulness, does need the invitation companion less).

But churfle it has a lesser wow than shareful because

  1. requires time for getting its meaning
  2. requires a high phonetic art
  3. it does increase joy of some experts, but is less trustful for newsharers overall



Shareful and law

  • "Invitation" refers to the terms (core + clauses + other specifications).
  • "Offer" is the object + terms.
By the way: "Invitation" generally means "invitation to an offer" in law.


Shareful default invitation offerorship

The object (cultural work) the Shareful Invitation default is, if required, it is offered freed, as any other wow.wiki.yt contents are.


Shareful is safer than sharing in conventional law

In any posible shareful conventional plaintiff, if the conventional authority would consider that:

  1. You have mislaid a thing by offering it shareful (you are being a society damager for dumping carelessly something in the public space). Tell us or directly tell them that they should go and sue the shareful default invitation writer and rest of other users
  2. You have gifted it. You can argue that is easier to say "for you" than "shareful", which even being a neologism, the epistemologic path to get to sharing is the more reasonable and traceable construction
  3. You have given a co-ownership of it. That can happen, as shareful is based in sharing, i.e.


Conventional law has sharing mainly specified as co-ownership, and less for when is sharing is a joint (concurrently or not) or for free borrowed use (most of the sharing cases in life and what shareful is for) and could cause the following trouble:

-Dear judge or else conventional authority, i saw him he was asking for light to people and i only gave him the following invitation to treat: "i can share the lighter with you" and he did not bring it back to me a minute later when i asked him for giving it back to me. He asked for my contact and stole it from me for a week!.

That judge could later interpret your sharing offer verbal phrase as if you had gifted part of co-ownership to that someone and closing your claim (instead of the liability in a breach of borrowing contract from that someone to you that you are looking for).

Rather having said: "shareful" (lighter), is supposed to have helped you a little bit more with conventional law authorities. Shareful clauses should be enforceable through the conventional law private contracting field but there have not been sharefulness with conventional law test cases (yet?).



Shareful wow is lovelier than law

Shareful wow has a more lovely vibration than law codes for sharing i.e.

We want shareful terms to be shared with please between people. We pretend the using of sensible smiles for inviting and for the acceptance of terms too, for being independent from the word "shareful". We don't pretend to "hack the law", we neither want to "crack the law", we "art the code".

Conventional law is highly artificial and its sophistication has a poor quality code. It creates an environment where people is being dependent on elitist lawyers and unreachable power structures for the most of us. Finally, there is also the Full Lawful Shareful Invitation project for making a copy of the SI based on lawyers language which will never be a parent of the default SI nor impede any of the rights offered with the default SI.


Damages dissuasion

Damages are discouraged with the settling defaults and with clauses i.e. requiring a grant, or using useful external tools i.e. trustful code.

The more that shareful offering grows around, the more a damage causes bad reputation. Every offeror is free to interpret such behaviour as "not caring" and imped you using according to that, you could try to difamate him but you are less.




Sharic

Action sharic:

[[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]]
offer1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
pack2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
project3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
[[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]] [[Shareful#|]]


Sharic legend

Template:Sharic legend




See also